| アブストラクト | OBJECTIVE: This study was to investigate the differences in the types, frequency, and perspectives of self-reported adverse events reported following simulation encounters between students enrolled in two Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) programs: accelerated option (AO-BSN) or traditional (T-BSN) and by role (participant or observer) during simulation. METHODS: This study analyzed 6994 adverse event reports entered by students through the simulated adverse event reporting system. RESULTS: The AO-BSN students reported a higher percentage of adverse events coded as errors. In contrast the T-BSN students reported more near misses and sentinel events. Further, the T-BSN students significantly reported more fall related errors, while AO-BSN students reported more confidentiality breach errors. Participants reported more medication errors, whereas observers reported more airway and fall categorized errors. CONCLUSION: The vantage from which adverse events are viewed and educational track appear to alter slightly the perceptions of the precipitating factors leading to committed or observed adverse events. |
|---|
| ジャーナル名 | Nurse education today |
|---|
| 投稿日 | 2018/8/27 |
|---|
| 投稿者 | Sanko, Jill S; Kim, Young-Ju; McKay, Mary |
|---|
| 組織名 | University of Miami, School of Nursing and Health Studies, United States of;America. Electronic address: j.sanko@miami.edu.;Sungshin Women's University, College of Nursing, South Korea. Electronic address:;yjkim727@sungshin.ac.kr.;America. Electronic address: mmckay@miami.edu. |
|---|
| Pubmed リンク | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30145532/ |
|---|
