| アブストラクト | BACKGROUND: One of the major reasons to stop antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) to prevent infective endocarditis (IE) in the United Kingdom but not in the rest of the world was that it would result in more deaths from fatal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than the number of IE deaths. The main aim of this study was to quantify and describe the ADRs with amoxicillin or clindamycin for IE AP. The second aim was to infer a crude incidence of anaphylaxis associated with amoxicillin for IE AP. STUDY DESIGN: The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was used to group ADRs for IE AP using the broad Standardized MedDRA Queries "Anaphylactic reaction, Amoxicillin, Clindamycin, Clostridium Difficile infection" to the French Pharmacovigilance Database System. From this first-line collection, we selected all cases occurring for IE AP and ultimately, the cases for IE AP for a dental procedure. Then, each case was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 11639 first-line recorded ADRs, 100 were for IE AP but no fatal anaphylaxis to amoxicillin or clindamycin and no C. difficile infection associated with clindamycin were identified. Only 17 cases of anaphylaxis to amoxicillin related to dental procedures were highlighted. The estimation of the crude incidence rate of anaphylaxis associated with amoxicillin for IE AP for invasive dental procedure was 1/57 000 (95% CI 0.2-0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Fatal or severe ADRs with amoxicillin or clindamycin is not a rational argument to stop IE AP before invasive dental procedures. |
|---|
| ジャーナル名 | Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal |
|---|
| 投稿日 | 2019/4/24 |
|---|
| 投稿者 | Cloitre, A; Duval, X; Tubiana, S; Giraud, P; Veyrac, G; Nosbaum, A; Gouraud, A; Mahe, J; Lesclous, P |
|---|
| 組織名 | Faculty of Dentistry, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44042 Nantes, France,;philippe.lesclous@univ-nantes.fr. |
|---|
| Pubmed リンク | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011140/ |
|---|
