| アブストラクト | OBJECTIVE: To characterize potential drug safety signals identified from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from 2008 to 2019, to determine how often these signals resulted in regulatory action by the FDA and whether these actions were corroborated by published research findings or public assessments by the Sentinel Initiative. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: USA. POPULATION: Safety signals identified from the FAERS and publicly reported by the FDA between 2008 and 2019; and review of the relevant literature published before and after safety signals were reported in 2014-15. Literature searches were performed in November 2019, Sentinel Initiative assessments were searched in December 2021, and data analysis was finalized in December 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety signals and resulting regulatory actions; number and characteristics of published studies, including corroboration of regulatory action as evidenced by significant associations (or no associations) between the drug related to the signal and the adverse event. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2019, 603 potential safety signals identified from the FAERS were reported by the FDA (median 48 annually, interquartile range 41-61), of which 413 (68.5%) were resolved as of December 2021 (372 of 399 (93.2%) signals >/=3 years old were resolved). Among the resolved safety signals, 91 (22.0%) led to no regulatory action and 322 (78.0%) resulted in regulatory action, including 319 (77.2%) changes to drug labeling and 59 (14.3%) drug safety communications or other public communications from the FDA. For a subset of 82 potential safety signals reported in 2014-15, a literature search identified 1712 relevant publications; 1201 (70.2%) were case reports or case series. Among these 82 safety signals, 76 (92.7%) were resolved, of which relevant published research was identified for 57 (75.0%) signals and relevant Sentinel Initiative assessments for four (5.3%) signals. Regulatory actions by the FDA were corroborated by at least one relevant published research study for 17 of the 57 (29.8%) resolved safety signals; none of the relevant Sentinel Initiative assessments corroborated FDA regulatory action. CONCLUSIONS: Most potential safety signals identified from the FAERS led to regulatory action by the FDA. Only a third of regulatory actions were corroborated by published research, however, and none by public assessments from the Sentinel Initiative. These findings suggest that either the FDA is taking regulatory actions based on evidence not made publicly available or more comprehensive safety evaluations might be needed when potential safety signals are identified. |
|---|
| 組織名 | Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.;Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New;Haven, CT, USA.;National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School;of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.;Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency, Department of Internal;Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.;Section of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University;School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.;Department of Ophthalmology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.;of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA joseph.ross@yale.edu.;Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New;Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Health System, New |
|---|
