アブストラクト | Objective: Status epilepticus is a major emergency condition. The choice of antiepileptic drugs for second-line treatment after benzodiazepine remains controversial, including levetiracetam vs. fosphenytoin. We compare the safety of intravenous levetiracetam and fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment in patients with status epilepticus using a nationwide database. Methods: An observational study conducted with the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database identified adult patients who had been admitted for status epilepticus and who had received intravenous diazepam on the day of admission from March 1, 2011 to March 31, 2018. Patients who received intravenous levetiracetam on the day of admission were defined as the levetiracetam group and those who received intravenous fosphenytoin on the day of admission were defined as the fosphenytoin group. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes obtained for the levetiracetam and fosphenytoin groups. Results: The analysis examined data of 5,667 patients. Overall, 1,403 (25%) patients received levetiracetam; 4,264 (75%) received fosphenytoin. One-to-one propensity score matching created 1,363 matched pairs. No significant difference was found in in-hospital mortality (5.2 vs. 5.1%; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.46). The proportion of vasopressor use on the day of admission was significantly lower for the levetiracetam group than for the fosphenytoin group (3.2 vs. 4.9%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.92). No significant difference was found in other secondary outcomes including total hospitalization cost. Conclusion: Levetiracetam was related to significantly reduced vasopressor use on the day of admission than that found for fosphenytoin, in adult status epilepticus. |
ジャーナル名 | Frontiers in neurology |
Pubmed追加日 | 2020/7/29 |
投稿者 | Nakamura, Kensuke; Ohbe, Hiroyuki; Matsui, Hiroki; Takahashi, Yuji; Marushima, Aiki; Inoue, Yoshiaki; Fushimi, Kiyohide; Yasunaga, Hideo |
組織名 | Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital,;Hitachi, Japan.;Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public;Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.;Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tsukuba University Hospital,;Tsukuba, Japan.;Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo;Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. |
Pubmed リンク | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32719650/ |