| アブストラクト | BACKGROUND: Primary care electronic health records (EHR) are widely used to study long-term conditions in epidemiological and health services research. Therefore, it is important to understand how well the recorded prevalence of these conditions in EHRs, compares to other reliable sources overall, and varies by socio-demographic characteristics. We aimed to describe the prevalence and socio-demographic variation of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic (CRM) and mental health (MH) conditions in a large, nationally representative, English primary care database and compare with prevalence estimates from other population-based studies. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum primary care database. We calculated prevalence of 18 conditions and used logistic regression to assess how this varied by age, sex, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. We searched the literature for population prevalence estimates from other sources for comparison with the prevalences in CPRD Aurum. RESULTS: Depression (16.0%, 95%CI 16.0-16.0%) and hypertension (15.3%, 95%CI 15.2-15.3%) were the most prevalent conditions among 12.4 million patients. Prevalence of most conditions increased with socio-economic deprivation and age. CRM conditions, schizophrenia and substance misuse were higher in men, whilst anxiety, depression, bipolar and eating disorders were more common in women. Cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and diabetes) were more prevalent in black and Asian patients compared with white, but the trends in prevalence of cardiovascular diseases by ethnicity were more variable. The recorded prevalences of mental health conditions were typically twice as high in white patients compared with other ethnic groups. However, PTSD and schizophrenia were more prevalent in black patients. The prevalence of most conditions was similar or higher in the primary care database than diagnosed disease prevalence reported in national health surveys. However, screening studies typically reported higher prevalence estimates than primary care data, especially for PTSD, bipolar disorder and eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of many clinically diagnosed conditions in primary care records closely matched that of other sources. However, we found important variations by sex and ethnicity, which may reflect true variation in prevalence or systematic differences in clinical presentation and practice. Primary care data may underrepresent the prevalence of undiagnosed conditions, particularly in mental health. |
|---|
| ジャーナル名 | BMC medical informatics and decision making |
|---|
| Pubmed追加日 | 2023/10/17 |
|---|
| 投稿者 | Cooper, Jennifer; Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah; Crowe, Francesca; Azcoaga-Lorenzo, Amaya; McCowan, Colin; Jackson, Thomas; Acharya, Aditya; Gokhale, Krishna; Gunathilaka, Niluka; Marshall, Tom; Haroon, Shamil |
|---|
| 組織名 | Institute of Applied Health Research, Health Data Science and Public Health,;University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.;University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. k.nirantharan@bham.ac.uk.;School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK.;Clinician Scientist in Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, |
|---|
| Pubmed リンク | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845709/ |
|---|
