| アブストラクト | Many observational studies explore the association between acetaminophen and cancer, but known limitations such as vulnerability to channeling, protopathic bias, and uncontrolled confounding hamper the interpretability of results. To help understand the potential magnitude of bias, we identify key design choices in these observational studies and specify 10 study design variants that represent different combinations of these design choices. We evaluate these variants by applying them to 37 negative controls - outcome presumed not to be caused by acetaminophen - as well as 4 cancer outcomes in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database. The estimated odds and hazards ratios for the negative controls show substantial bias in the evaluated design variants, with far fewer of the 95% confidence intervals containing 1 than the nominal 95% expected for negative controls. The effect-size estimates for the cancer outcomes are comparable to those observed for the negative controls. A comparison of exposed and unexposed reveals many differences at baseline for which most studies do not correct. We observe that the design choices made in many of the published observational studies can lead to substantial bias. Thus, caution in the interpretation of published studies of acetaminophen and cancer is recommended. |
|---|
| ジャーナル名 | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP |
|---|
| Pubmed追加日 | 2021/1/18 |
|---|
| 投稿者 | Schuemie, Martijn J; Weinstein, Rachel; Ryan, Patrick B; Berlin, Jesse A |
|---|
| 組織名 | Department of Epidemiology, Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ,;USA. Electronic address: mschuemi@its.jnj.com.;USA.;Department of Epidemiology, Johnson & Johnson, Titusville, NJ, USA. |
|---|
| Pubmed リンク | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454352/ |
|---|
